![]() On its website, Apple compares the new chip to the 16-core. Clearly, Fusion Drive works and provides users with measurably and tangible speed gains. To give us a better idea of that performance, a Geekbench test shows that Apple’s latest chip beats the 28-core Intel Mac Pro. ![]() Fortunately, the time the iMac took to fire up Adobe Photoshop CS6 is blazing quick. The MacBook Pro (13-inch Mid 2017) with an Intel Core i5-7267U processor scores 1,058 for single-core performance and 2,221 for multi-core performance in the Geekbench 6 CPU Benchmark. Although, cold start and reboot timings are noticeably slower than the Retina MacBook Pro and MacBook Air, it was still very much quicker than our Late 2011 MacBook Pro and its mechanical drive. The MacBook Pro (13-inch Mid 2017) is a Mac laptop with an Intel Core i5-7267U processor. Geekbench results also reveal that the M2 Pro and M2 Max in the new MacBook Pros both have single-core and multi-core scores of around 1,900 and 15,000, respectively, meaning they offer up to 20. Our Late 2011 15-inch MacBook Pro which has a 750GB (5400rpm) hard disk will serve as a baseline reference.īearing in mind that the iMac has a Fusion Drive that consists of a 128GB SSD unit and a 1TB traditional mechanical hard disk, we would say that the results we've obtained below are pretty impressive. ![]() If Fusion Drive is working, we should see timings that are comparable to our Retina MacBook Pro and MacBook Air, since they both use flash storage. Since Fusion Drive works completely in the background, we decided to run time trials to see how fast the iMac starts, reboots and loads Adobe Photoshop 6. The new iMac was also substantially faster than both the Late 2011 15-inch MacBook Pro (Core i7-2720QM) and the Mid 2011 MacBook Air (Core i5-2557M). How much of this was due to the iMac’s superior Core i7-3770S processor or Fusion Drive was hard to tell, but it is clear that the new iMac is a speedy system. In all, its score of 13700 was the highest, easily surpassing the Mid 2012 15-inch MacBook Pro Retina (Core i7-3720QM) by around 5%. To ensure Fusion Drive is being utilized (if at all), we ran Geekbench on the iMac several times before recording down its result. Geekbench runs a variety of tests that taxes individual components of a system such as the processor and memory and then gives an overall score of the system’s performance. We begin our iMac performance benchmarking with Geekbench, a popular Mac OS X benchmarking tool. These benchmarks run in Mac OS X and we’ll be pitting the iMac against three other Mac systems - a Mid 2012 Retina MacBook Pro, a Late 2011 MacBook Pro and a Mid 2011 MacBook Air. We began our benchmarking of the new iMac with Geekbench and testing the Fusion Drive. They either make do with what's in the new Pro - or find an alternative.Performance (Part 1) Performance (Part 1) 3DMark06 CPU, Cinebench R20, Geekbench 5.4 64-Bit Multi-Core Score. I'm pretty sure they bought plenty of external graphics cards to go into their Pros. So, unless youre buying a MacBook or iMac, the only architecture you need to worry. Those folks, I imagine, don't care too much about the base price of the Mac Pros they buy - they care they can get ever more photorealistic CGI done quickly. In general, I think I agree with analysts/posters who think Apple lost sight of who the prime users for their Mac Pro are: video/CGI folks who use the Mac to make movies, ads, etc. ![]() And whether they're typically done on a desk-side machine vs. Not saying they don't exist - I'm just interested in what they are. Based on past experience I would expect the 2023 to crash once the memory usage gets close to the max.Ĭount me naive, but I'd love to know what single simulation requires an in-memory dataset that large. I would like to see a comparison where someone performs the same physics 3D simulation with a dataset larger than 192GB with a maxed out 2023 Mac Pro vs a maxed out 2019.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |